No internet connection
  1. Home
  2. Support

RS_Load Track Preset

By Gary Philips @Gary_Philips
    2024-03-08 06:28:49.113Z

    RS_Load Track Preset

    System Information

    SoundFlow 5.7.0

    OS: darwin 21.6.0

    ProductName: macOS
    ProductVersion: 12.7.3
    BuildVersion: 21H1015

    Steps to Reproduce

    1. Run RS_Load Track Preset script (same script that's been working for years)

    Expected Result

    PT loads indicasted track preset

    Actual Result

    error. can't find pop up menu

    Workaround

    load track presets via right-click (yuck)

    Other Notes

    Links

    User UID: SvvTAi4f55Q3ZPiR87JW0e8nJNs2

    Feedback Key: sffeedback:SvvTAi4f55Q3ZPiR87JW0e8nJNs2:-NsRk-07h7V84mFfdCg1

    Feedback ZIP: Pi1UBJYFP0yUwofeZER8qAGUxZCz5ESrprFnG9TmBGQGoE2i/B9P9w5qAfmjme+LDOrv5AtMr3E1EC+D9BmKnQI0HQbH4guxFY3QsT3y/3eab1fesR6vjAa8G3bxdWSS/DGhLzU6zkHrpBVJ+gq/g4IqpD7kpGJwHIfqjwjQzyzOqDhWv7D/xMs5RahTuKEVuTBC0lAG5fkWOUe9MWpK2jfEFz/WOD/iB5EkXid4bTaA8vtBSLTVpFVe/eSo293hQ2Nj6wB65d4sMNbVvw8hTEBVn89kT4YQfTDY1qChwOUNjy2/nl17BcV8tHFwx8YSQ4pVRmhzMywxlgy9NsPgAz1/8Nl9PLV2Ai0s6PqHuYg=

    Solved in post #6, click to view
    Reply

    Linked from:

    1. Recall track presets isn't working since update of Pro Tools 2023.12.0, latest version of Soundflow
    • 11 replies
    1. S
      SoundFlow Bot @soundflowbot
        2024-03-08 15:28:21.368Z

        This issue is now tracked internally by SoundFlow as SF-1120

        Reply
        1. In reply toGary_Philips⬆:
          Christian Scheuer @chrscheuer2024-03-08 15:28:51.092Z

          Hi Gary,

          Tagging @raphaelsepulveda here so we can get all eyes on how to update this script to work.

          Reply1 Like
          1. In reply toGary_Philips⬆:
            Raphael Sepulveda @raphaelsepulveda2024-03-08 16:20:35.465Z

            Hey @Gary_Philips, the bug has been identified on PT 2024.3 and a fix is coming.
            Will update this space once the update is live.

            Reply3 Likes
            1. Gary Philips @Gary_Philips
                2024-03-08 21:08:14.651Z

                apologies for not reporting this earlier -- I just assumed every body on beta versions of PT was experiencing the same and 5.7 would fix it

                Reply
                1. Raphael Sepulveda @raphaelsepulveda2024-03-09 07:29:54.858Z

                  @Gary_Philips, v1.4.0 of my package is now available in the store. This update fixes the issue you're seeing with RS_Recall Track Preset.

                  SoundFlow v5.7 is required to see and install this update, which I already know you have, just informing any future readers.

                  Reply2 LikesSolution
                  1. Gary Philips @Gary_Philips
                      2024-03-09 20:24:57.147Z

                      Hey @raphaelsepulveda
                      Just checked and I'm still only seeing v1.3.5 in the store. Is there a lag time before it's available maybe?
                      Thanks!

                      NVM, SoundFlow required a quit and restart to see the update. Thanks for being so fast Raphael!

                      Reply1 Like
                      1. Raphael Sepulveda @raphaelsepulveda2024-03-09 20:28:44.366Z

                        It should be available now.
                        Could you try quitting SoundFlow completely and launching it again? That should help refresh the store.

                        Reply1 Like
                2. In reply toGary_Philips⬆:
                  Gary Philips @Gary_Philips
                    2024-03-10 03:04:48.221Z

                    @raphaelsepulveda I can't do an A/B test here at this point, but it seems like the script takes noticeably longer with the latest tweak. . . did you notice anything similar?

                    Reply
                    1. Raphael Sepulveda @raphaelsepulveda2024-03-10 04:30:35.041Z

                      @Gary_Philips, thanks for the feedback!

                      I did try to add a quality-of-life improvement to this command, but seems like it doesn't perform as well as I hoped out in the wild.
                      I've just uploaded v1.4.1 of the package which rolls back on that implementation. Let me know if it's snappier on your end.

                      Reply
                      1. Gary Philips @Gary_Philips
                          2024-03-10 04:35:39.492Z

                          Thanks @raphaelsepulveda
                          Just tried 1.4.1 and it SEEMS to be back to the pace of the previous 1.3.5 version -- but I say this with no empirical evidence!

                          Reply1 Like
                          1. Raphael Sepulveda @raphaelsepulveda2024-03-10 04:38:58.961Z

                            Haha, that's a good sign! Let me know how it performs as you use it more.

                            Reply1 Like
                      ReplyAdd progress note